Current:Home > NewsCalifornia voters lose a shot at checking state and local tax hikes at the polls -Visionary Wealth Guides
California voters lose a shot at checking state and local tax hikes at the polls
NovaQuant View
Date:2025-04-09 15:57:18
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — The California Supreme Court on Thursday removed a measure from the November ballot that would have made it harder to raise taxes, siding with Gov. Gavin Newsom and his Democratic allies in the state Legislature.
The measure would have required voter approval for tax increases passed by the state Legislature. It also would have raised the threshold required for voter approval of certain local government tax increases to a two-thirds vote at the polls. Currently those tax increases can take affect if a simple majority of voters approve.
The measure would have applied retroactively to most tax increases approved since Jan. 1, 2022. Local governments warned that would mean they could have lost billions of dollars in revenue that had previously been approved by voters.
Newsom has opposed many tax increases during his time in office. But he sued to block this measure, saying it would harm local governments and take away the Legislature’s ability to raise taxes.
Supporters of the ballot measure argued that California has become too expensive and voters need more control over taxes. In a unanimous decision, the court ruled the measure could not be enacted by ballot initiative because it “would substantially alter our basic plan of government.” Justice Goodwin Liu wrote the opinion. “The Supreme Court’s decision to take this dangerous initiative off the ballot avoids a host of catastrophic impacts, protecting billions of dollars for schools, access to reproductive health care, gun safety laws that keep students safe in classrooms, and paid family leave,” said Jonathan Underland, spokesperson for the campaign that opposed the initiative. Removing a qualified measure from the ballot before an election is rare in California, but not unprecedented. The court wrote it was necessary in this case to review the initiative because it would have potentially voided tax increases put in place after Jan. 1, 2022. That may have deprived government of some funding lawmakers were counting on.
veryGood! (86)
Related
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- Only about 2 in 10 Americans approve of Biden’s pardon of his son Hunter, an AP
- Not sure what to write in your holiday card? These tips can help: Video tutorial
- Arizona city sues federal government over PFAS contamination at Air Force base
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- What is Sora? Account creation paused after high demand of AI video generator
- Fatal Hougang stabbing: Victim was mum of 3, moved to Singapore to provide for family
- 'The Later Daters': Cast, how to stream new Michelle Obama
- Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
- 'Unimaginable situation': South Korea endures fallout from martial law effort
Ranking
- Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
- OCBC chief Helen Wong joins Ho Ching, Jenny Lee on Forbes' 100 most powerful women list
- 'Yellowstone' Season 5, Part 2: Here's when the final episode comes out and how to watch
- Alex Jones keeps Infowars for now after judge rejects The Onion’s winning auction bid
- Charges tied to China weigh on GM in Q4, but profit and revenue top expectations
- Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
- Horoscopes Today, December 11, 2024
- Morgan Wallen's Chair Throwing Case Heading to Criminal Court
Recommendation
Jamie Foxx gets stitches after a glass is thrown at him during dinner in Beverly Hills
Neanderthals likely began 'mixing' with modern humans later than previously thought
Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
Elon Musk just gave Nvidia investors one billion reasons to cheer for reported partnership
House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
Elon Musk just gave Nvidia investors one billion reasons to cheer for reported partnership
Man on trial in Ole Miss student’s death lied to investigators, police chief says